Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
SCE Modernization Discovery
Get the target design, implementation recommendations and a roadmap to a validated, modern and scalable SCE that takes your teams from data to submission faster.
Your next SCE, designed with QA in the room from day one

Business defines the need, IT designs the solution, and QA sees it last. If a submission depends on the environment, rework delays the launch, and each day of delay is lost revenue.
Compliance requirements surface after the architecture is set, and the redesign is paid at implementation rates.
Without clear requirements and a technical design, there is nothing to estimate qualification against, and the go-live date drifts.
Tool and vendor choices drag on because nobody compares them on fit, cost and validation effort together.
#What You Get
Every open technical decision gets a recommendation, the reasoning behind it, and an owner.
Compute, storage, execution and environment promotion, integrated with the systems you run and the ones you plan.
Tools and vendors with trade-offs, build approach, first-release scope and backlog, and a team and effort estimate.
User and technical requirements in plain language, each marked for GxP relevance as it is captured.
A risk-based qualification approach for accuracy, reproducibility and traceability that QA can estimate against and that holds up at inspection.
What must be ready by your deadline, what follows, and written scope boundaries for both.
A go/no-go recommendation your leadership can sign off.
#How It Works
Each layer builds on the one before, so the design solves the right problem and can be qualified from the start. Flexible format based on your and your team's needs, from one to three days on-site with business, IT and QA. Below is the full three-day format.
We review your documentation, systems and existing requirements, and agree who needs to be in each session.
Current and future processes, then user requirements in plain language, before any technology is chosen.
Target architecture, tools and vendors, integration with your systems, and the path from development to production, with compliance requirements captured alongside.
The risk picture and the design become a qualification strategy QA can commit to. Decision-makers sign off the roadmap before we leave.
We consolidate the outputs into the final design, recommendations and roadmap, and walk your team through them.
#Who Runs It
Designs the target state with your team and challenges the assumptions under it, including ours.
Knows what production runs, study promotion and job orchestration cost on the stack you have.
Part 11, Annex 11 and GAMP 5 experience. Writes a validation strategy your QA can sign.
Brings the study team's view: how biostatistics works day to day and what QA will ask of the environment, so the design fits both.
We agree the format on the scoping call, from one day to the full three-day workshop, and fix the price once it is scoped. Travel, pre-work and the compliance specialist are included. Deliverables follow within about two to four weeks.
If your submission depends on the new environment, plan for the full three days, so every decision on the critical path is made and signed off before the build starts.
Book a Scoping CallBuilding or modernizing a GxP statistical computing environment
Adopting Posit, Domino or Databricks for validated work
Moving from SAS to R
Turning prototype tools into production software
Bringing AI into regulated workflows
Not a fit: skills training, a single app fix or a code review.
#Proof
Management pulled the go-live forward by two quarters. Discovery gave QA what it needed to estimate qualification for the new date.
The client chose Appsilon because discovery laid out a phased path from PK/PD simulations to clinical statistics.






Ebook for Clinical Data & Platform Leaders
What a modern SCE has to include, how risk-based validation works in practice, where AI fits inside the compliance boundary, and how other pharma teams sequenced their builds.
What clients ask before booking. Anything else, ask on the call.
No. It is a decision engagement that ends with a technical design, implementation recommendations and a roadmap your leadership signs off.
No. Building consolidated, compliance-tagged requirements with you is part of the work. If you have already mapped workflows and defined components, we start from your map.
No. Each session lists who is needed. Business stakeholders can skip the deep technical sessions. QA and the technical lead join the validation strategy session, and a project manager stays in the room throughout. Individual participants can join remotely.
QA joins only the sessions where its input is essential, and the compliance view is represented throughout.
No. We recommend the tools that fit your requirements, roadmap and validation effort, including platforms you already run.
You leave with a costed first release. Build it with your own team, take the plan to another vendor, or continue with us through embedded engineers, part-time validation support or phased build releases. If you continue, the next phase is scoped and priced within about two weeks.
We design, build and validate statistical computing environments in your cloud, and stay through go-live.