Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Custom applications and coded tools for pharma and life sciences. We turn complex clinical and scientific data into tools your teams actually work in: adopted by the people who need them, maintained long past the first release, and ready for the validation your QA will ask for.

Where these projects stall
Most teams we meet can already write R. The app exists, or a version of it does. What stops the work is something else.
It runs, and it has run for years. One person wrote it and understands every line of it. That person is now overloaded, or leaving. Nobody else can change it safely, so nobody changes it, and everything downstream moves at the speed of one person's calendar.
A statistician has an approach that works. Every study, someone asks them to run it again. It never becomes something other people can use on their own, so the expert spends their time re-running analyses instead of designing new ones, and the method is never reviewed by anyone else.
Requirements met, app delivered, sign-off collected. Six months later the intended users are still exporting to Excel. The gap is almost never functionality. It is the ninety-second load, the login nobody automated, the layout that assumes you already know what you are looking at.
What we build
One engagement, whichever of these you start with. Most clients arrive with one and end up buying two.
Applications people open and do something in. A reviewer approves a result, a programmer runs a study, a lead signs off and the sign-off is recorded. A different object from a page of charts, and built differently.
Legacy tools that still work but nobody wants to touch. We move that work onto a modern open-source stack without stopping it while we do, and your team owns what comes out the other side.
SAS to R: Migration to Open Source · GxP-compliant Posit stack
An application that cannot survive an audit cannot be used for the decisions that matter. We build with that in mind from the first sprint, alongside your QA rather than handing them a finished thing to argue with.
R Package Validation · GxP Compliance Audit · five weeks to five minutes
Engineers who already understand clinical work, embedded in your team for as long as the work needs them. People who know why the thing they are building matters, and who will argue with you about it when that is useful.
Tools and technologies
We help you work out what the thing should be built in, and then build it. That decision happens in the first weeks, with your platform team in the room.
Being a Posit Certified Partner means your IT and platform owners do not have to take a chance on us. That gate is usually the slowest one in the process, and we clear it by default.
Where this work shows up
Every row links to a published case study.







Data Engineering Lead
Top 10 Pharma Company
Associate Director
Top 50 Pharma Company
Human Resources People Partner
Top 10 Pharma Company
A trusted partner to leading pharmaceutical and life sciences organizations worldwide.
Out of 15,000+ applicants each year, only 1% are selected to join our team - a diverse group of programmers, managers, biostatisticians, and PhD-level scientists actively contributing to the industry.
With over 150 projects delivered for pharmaceutical companies, you gain access to our deep, collective expertise and training support from experienced delivery managers, biostatisticians, programmers, and scientists.
Our team members are creators and contributors to open-source frameworks such as Rhino, aNCA, teal, and many more—collectively downloaded nearly 500,000 times. We are active participants in Pharmaverse and R Consortium working groups.
8 out of the 10 world’s largest pharmaceutical companies have trusted our programmers and statisticians to support AI-driven workflows, analyse all types from data: from clinical and real-world data (RWD) to drug discovery experiments.
Questions we get
No. R and Shiny are where we are best known and where most clinical work sits, but we build React front-ends, Python services and full-stack applications where those fit better. Choosing between them is part of what you are hiring us for.
Usually one of three things: take an application that one person owns and make it survivable for a team, get an app that exists but is not used to the point where it is, or bring GxP and validation experience your team has not had to build yet. If none of those describe your situation, say so on the call and we will tell you honestly.
Yes, and we would rather. We are a Posit Certified Partner, and working inside your existing change control and validation process is normal for us, not an exception we charge for.
No. A Statistical Computing Environment is the platform your analysis work runs on. This is the applications and tools that run on top of it. Teams often buy both, in either order.
A call where you describe the situation and we tell you whether we are a fit. If we are, the next step is a scoped piece of work with a defined output and a defined end.
Custom applications and coded tools for pharma, built in Shiny, React, Python and R by engineers who already understand clinical work.